Display title | Controversy-Proof Image |
Default sort key | Controversy-Proof Image |
Page length (in bytes) | 10,951 |
Namespace ID | 0 |
Page ID | 119687 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
Page creator | m>Import Bot |
Date of page creation | 21:27, 1 November 2013 |
Latest editor | Blakegripling ph (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 09:07, 29 September 2021 |
Total number of edits | 15 |
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Transcluded templates (4) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Musicians from certain genres can survive scandalous controversies that would destroy or cripple other, pure mainstream, artists. For instance, any pop artist who said or did anything politically controversial, or something that were legally reprehensible and possibly career ending, could normally be survived by Alt/Rock, Heavy Metal, or Hardcore Hip Hop/Gangsta Rap artists. Pop artists come under scrutiny and they have to backpedal, clean up their image etc. With the other aforementioned genres, it probably helps their image. Sure, the Moral Guardians will whine real loudly, but nothing will ever come of it. The artist's image and fanbase remain intact. |