| Display title | Doing In the Wizard |
| Default sort key | Doing In the Wizard |
| Page length (in bytes) | 67,457 |
| Namespace ID | 0 |
| Page ID | 163500 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 1 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Number of subpages of this page | 3 (0 redirects; 3 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | m>Import Bot |
| Date of page creation | 21:27, 1 November 2013 |
| Latest editor | Looney Toons (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 20:39, 17 August 2023 |
| Total number of edits | 29 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
| Transcluded templates (6) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Removing a relatively poetic or mystical element (or possibility) and replacing it by way of Retcon with a more "realistic" one, in a Revision, sequel or other adaptation, or occasionally even just later in the same story. This is pretty common in a fantasy-to-Sci Fi situation, probably because the two aren't too different in the outcome produced -- a magical invisibility ring vs. a technological cloaking device are functionally the same. However, it tends to disgruntle fans of the original, especially when the explanation is less satisfying than the mystery. Amusingly, if the answer is in Techno Babble, its "reality quotient" is just as silly as the initial explanation. It can also demand a whole sequence of coincidental oddities, which (as observed by Aristotle) just makes it less convincing. |