I, Robot (literature)/Fridge: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Looney Toons (talk | contribs) (created with transplanted items) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
** Based on what we see of him, I suspect Byerley would shoot himself anyway, human or not. If he could get away with shooting himself somewhere non-lethal, he would, and then refuse to let anybody examine the wound. The only way to be really sure would be to explicitly specify a lethal injury -- and killing him is further than most people would be prepared to go to settle the question. -- [[User:Paul A]] |
** Based on what we see of him, I suspect Byerley would shoot himself anyway, human or not. If he could get away with shooting himself somewhere non-lethal, he would, and then refuse to let anybody examine the wound. The only way to be really sure would be to explicitly specify a lethal injury -- and killing him is further than most people would be prepared to go to settle the question. -- [[User:Paul A]] |
||
---- |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
:<small>Back to ''[[{{ROOTPAGENAME}}]]''</small> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
{{reflist}} |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
Latest revision as of 22:13, 10 April 2019
Fridge Brilliance
Fridge Horror
Fridge Logic
- One way to prove whether or not Stephen Byerley was a robot would be to put a loaded gun in front of him and order him to shoot himself. If he is human, then he can refuse. If he is a robot, then he will be compelled to obey.
- Based on what we see of him, I suspect Byerley would shoot himself anyway, human or not. If he could get away with shooting himself somewhere non-lethal, he would, and then refuse to let anybody examine the wound. The only way to be really sure would be to explicitly specify a lethal injury -- and killing him is further than most people would be prepared to go to settle the question. -- User:Paul A
- Back to I, Robot (literature)