Display title | Nuke'Em |
Default sort key | Nuke'Em |
Page length (in bytes) | 42,393 |
Namespace ID | 0 |
Page ID | 119957 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Number of subpages of this page | 2 (0 redirects; 2 non-redirects) |
Page image | |
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
Page creator | m>Import Bot |
Date of page creation | 21:27, 1 November 2013 |
Latest editor | Looney Toons (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 02:23, 29 April 2024 |
Total number of edits | 20 |
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 2 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 2 |
Transcluded templates (6) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | When faced with a Monster of the Week, military commanders show an unhealthy urge to move right up to the (current) Final Option when the monster can't be killed with bullets. They never stop to consider using something else in their arsenal that's a bit more powerful than a rifle, but won't cause as much collateral damage as a low-yield (or, depending on who is in charge, a high-yield) nuclear bomb. It's all or nothing. If hand-held guns didn't do the trick, forget artillery, bunker-busters, fuel-air explosives, chemical or biological agents, just get the nukes. |