| Display title | Overly Narrow Superlative |
| Default sort key | Overly Narrow Superlative |
| Page length (in bytes) | 56,312 |
| Namespace ID | 0 |
| Page ID | 158527 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Number of subpages of this page | 1 (0 redirects; 1 non-redirect) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | m>Import Bot |
| Date of page creation | 21:27, 1 November 2013 |
| Latest editor | Looney Toons (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 16:09, 28 February 2024 |
| Total number of edits | 44 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 1 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Transcluded templates (9) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | This trope covers situations where something seems to be highly praised, but the praise is only relative to an extremely small—or intrinsically awful—group (often a group of one), rendering it meaningless. Sometimes the intent is for the praise to be taken seriously (in which case it becomes a version of the Sharpshooter Fallacy)—but the more frequent implication is that there isn't any larger category relative to which it can apply, thus "necessitating" that the Overly Narrow Superlative invent one. Sometimes the joke is that, even in such an incredibly narrow category, the thing being discussed still isn't first, making it a Stealth Insult of sorts. |