Display title | Parody Retcon |
Default sort key | Parody Retcon |
Page length (in bytes) | 16,526 |
Namespace ID | 0 |
Page ID | 169717 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Number of subpages of this page | 2 (0 redirects; 2 non-redirects) |
Page image | |
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
Page creator | m>Import Bot |
Date of page creation | 21:27, 1 November 2013 |
Latest editor | InternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 05:27, 18 February 2023 |
Total number of edits | 12 |
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Transcluded templates (6) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | So you've made a movie, it's out in theaters, and you're feeling pretty good about it. You pick up the paper one day, hoping the good reviews will confirm your aspirations...only the critics aren't saying what you hoped they would. The audience laughed where they should have cried, cringed where they should have laughed, gagged where they should have gone "aww!", and made a Drinking Game out of the boringly-predictable action sequences that you thought sounded pretty good on paper. Meanwhile the critics ruthlessly vivisected your story, exposing it for the mess of cliches, flat characters, and plot holes it is. What's a filmmaker to do? |