Information for "Radio Friendliness"

Basic information

Display titleRadio Friendliness
Default sort keyRadio Friendliness
Page length (in bytes)5,473
Namespace ID0
Page ID59660
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page0
Counted as a content pageYes
Number of subpages of this page0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects)

Page protection

EditAllow all users (infinite)
MoveAllow all users (infinite)
DeleteAllow all users (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorprefix>Import Bot
Date of page creation21:27, 1 November 2013
Latest editorLooney Toons (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit20:04, 12 June 2018
Total number of edits13
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

Page properties

Transcluded templates (5)

Templates used on this page:

Lint errors

Missing end tag1
View detailed information on the lint errors.

SEO properties

Description

Content

Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
There are certain songs that simply don't fit the radio medium very well. They may be too long, too artsy, too controversial, too dark, too political, or simply, regardless of quality or merit, are just too risky to fit on a playlist when the Billboard top 40 is so much easier. As a consequence, some acts get exposure that others cannot. For music, Radio Friendliness is the opposite of True Art Is Incomprehensible. Of course, no matter how much Fan Dumb a niche-artist's audience possesses, sometimes, their music is just too boring or too bad to be played on the radio.
Information from Extension:WikiSEO