Jump to content

Lamarck Was Right: Difference between revisions

Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.6
(Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.6)
Line 215:
* Briefly thought to have occured with second-generation phocomelia, a congenital deformity primarily seen in infants whose mothers used thalidomide during pregnancy. Although the damage inflicted on these unborn children was environmental in origin, a small number of phocomeliacs subsequently grew up, married one another, and (rarely) produced phocomeliac children. Further investigation subverted this trope, revealing that children who'd been deformed by thalidomide had ''already'' been genetically predisposed to suffer such developmental flaws in response to chemical contaminants, and their second-generation children inherited a double dose of that susceptibility, making them subject to phocomelia even in the absence of thalidomide.
* To a certain extent, this is true anyway, though less based upon what your parents did, and more what they ''[[I Did What I Had to Do|needed to do]] to survive.'' For example, native-born Koreans [[wikipedia:Body odor|don't sweat the same way]], because not sweating is a way to survive in cold climates. Likewise tanning skin is likely an adaptation to very sunny climates. The process, however, is reversible over time if the need suddenly no longer exists.
* [httphttps://wwwweb.archive.org/web/20130919120359/http://freakonomics.com/2011/06/07/the-economist-guide-to-parenting-full-transcript/ Analysis of adopted Korean War orphans] showed a surprising amount of genetic influence over the life of the child. The education level of the adopted parents had a puny effect on the adopted child's education (each year of maternal education translated to a four-week boost to the child) and the adopted parents had no effect at all on the child's adult income.
 
{{reflist}}
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.