Template:Watsonian Versus Doylist: Difference between revisions
Looney Toons (talk | contribs) (created featured article blurb) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{quote|''There are ''no'' inconsistencies in the [[Discworld]] books; occasionally, however, [[No Except Yes|there are alternate pasts]].''|'''[[Terry Pratchett]]''' on alt.fan.pratchett, wearing his Watsonian hat.}} |
{{quote|''There are ''no'' inconsistencies in the [[Discworld]] books; occasionally, however, [[No Except Yes|there are alternate pasts]].''|'''[[Terry Pratchett]]''' on alt.fan.pratchett, wearing his Watsonian hat.}} |
||
{{quote|''Maybe [the Patrician in ''[[ |
{{quote|''Maybe [the Patrician in ''[[The Colour of Magic]]''] was Vetinari, but written by [[Self-Deprecation|a more stupid writer?]]''|'''[[Terry Pratchett]]''' on alt.fan.pratchett, wearing his Doylist hat.}} |
||
'''Watsonian''' or '''in-universe''' commentary takes the reality of a work as given, and thus restricts itself to making statements that are sensible within that reality. Watsonian explanations are things like "Character X was lying", "He had plastic surgery over the summer", and "The main character fell off a cliff". A more precise technical term for this is ''intradiegetic''. |
'''Watsonian''' or '''in-universe''' commentary takes the reality of a work as given, and thus restricts itself to making statements that are sensible within that reality. Watsonian explanations are things like "Character X was lying", "He had plastic surgery over the summer", and "The main character fell off a cliff". A more precise technical term for this is ''intradiegetic''. |
||
Latest revision as of 21:31, 26 October 2023
 |
There are no inconsistencies in the Discworld books; occasionally, however, there are alternate pasts.
—Terry Pratchett on alt.fan.pratchett, wearing his Watsonian hat.
|
 |
|
Maybe [the Patrician in The Colour of Magic] was Vetinari, but written by a more stupid writer?
—Terry Pratchett on alt.fan.pratchett, wearing his Doylist hat.
|
|
Watsonian or in-universe commentary takes the reality of a work as given, and thus restricts itself to making statements that are sensible within that reality. Watsonian explanations are things like "Character X was lying", "He had plastic surgery over the summer", and "The main character fell off a cliff". A more precise technical term for this is intradiegetic.
Doylist or out-of-universe commentary considers the work as a created object, and prefers explanations based on the real-world motivations or circumstances of the creators. Doylist explanations are things like "The author had a Better Idea", "The actor died, so they had to hire a new one", and "The author got sick of writing those books, so he killed off the main character". A technical term for this is extradiegetic.