| Display title | Bodyguard Crush |
| Default sort key | Bodyguard Crush |
| Page length (in bytes) | 61,956 |
| Namespace ID | 0 |
| Page ID | 110574 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Number of subpages of this page | 3 (0 redirects; 3 non-redirects) |
| Page image |  |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | m>Import Bot |
| Date of page creation | 21:27, 1 November 2013 |
| Latest editor | Looney Toons (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 14:10, 9 August 2021 |
| Total number of edits | 28 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
| Transcluded templates (6) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Modern beliefs in equal gender rights make the good old Rescue Romance trope somewhat difficult to play straight. However, there's a question in the air... what if "that male" is either hired or honor-bound to protect "that female"? That wouldn't be chauvinist at all - not only is the guy getting rewarded or paid (whether in money, benefits, rank raises, etc.) by his bosses or upperclassmen for taking care of the girl's safety, with his reputation as a whole depends heavily on how well he guards and shields her, but it fulfills residual Knight in Shining Armor imagery without causing eyebrow raising among the fandom. |
