Murder One: Difference between revisions

Everything About Fiction You Never Wanted to Know.
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{trope}}
{{work}}
A [[Legal Drama]] like no other; The first series follows a single murder case across twenty three episodes, covering ground almost never seen in any other legal drama (several episodes are spent on the process of jury selection, for instance). The second series, with several key cast changes and a softening of the previous tight focus, was not as successful, but it's hardly devoid of interest.
A [[Legal Drama]] like no other; The first series follows a single murder case across twenty three episodes, covering ground almost never seen in any other legal drama (several episodes are spent on the process of jury selection, for instance). The second series, with several key cast changes and a softening of the previous tight focus, was not as successful, but it's hardly devoid of interest.


{{tropelist}}
----
== First series ==
=== Series One provides examples of: ===
* [[Always Murder]]: Slightly averted in that several other trials, mostly not murders, are shown, mostly during the earlier episodes. But, well, [[Exactly What It Says On the Tin|it is right there in the title.]]
* [[Always Murder]]: Slightly averted in that several other trials, mostly not murders, are shown, mostly during the earlier episodes. But, well, [[Exactly What It Says on the Tin|it is right there in the title.]]
* [[Amoral Attorney]]: The firm's lawyers often walk down the knife edge of acceptable behaviour, staying just out of this trope. One divorce lawyer that we meet, however, not only embodies this trope but gleefully embraces it.
* [[Amoral Attorney]]: The firm's lawyers often walk down the knife edge of acceptable behaviour, staying just out of this trope. One divorce lawyer that we meet, however, not only embodies this trope but gleefully embraces it.
** The morality is made even greyer by the fact that, while defending people They may know to be murderers, the lawyers genuinely believe in what They are doing, that every individual deserves the best legal aid They can get.
** The morality is made even greyer by the fact that, while defending people They may know to be murderers, the lawyers genuinely believe in what They are doing, that every individual deserves the best legal aid They can get.
Line 17: Line 17:
* [[Screw the Money, I Have Rules]]: Played straight wit Ted's refusal to represent Jessica Costello's murderer for the sum of twenty million. After seeing how much damage He has caused, He tells him there isn't enough money in the world.
* [[Screw the Money, I Have Rules]]: Played straight wit Ted's refusal to represent Jessica Costello's murderer for the sum of twenty million. After seeing how much damage He has caused, He tells him there isn't enough money in the world.
* [[Screw the Rules, I Have Money]]: Averted, then played at full strength. Richard Cross has massive amounts of both money and connections, including being a financial supporter of the current DA. It doesn't do him a whole lot of good, initially, as everyone is keen to be seen not to be caving in to him. After everyone has demonstrated for the press and public just how unimpressed they are, things change.
* [[Screw the Rules, I Have Money]]: Averted, then played at full strength. Richard Cross has massive amounts of both money and connections, including being a financial supporter of the current DA. It doesn't do him a whole lot of good, initially, as everyone is keen to be seen not to be caving in to him. After everyone has demonstrated for the press and public just how unimpressed they are, things change.
* [[Shout Out]]: Hoffman and his associates often refer to an unseen "Ensalmo case," a running gag in ''[[Moonlighting]]''.
* [[Shout-Out]]: Hoffman and his associates often refer to an unseen "Ensalmo case," a running gag in ''[[Moonlighting]]''.

== Second series ==
{{Needs More Tropes}}


{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}
Line 23: Line 26:
[[Category:American Series]]
[[Category:American Series]]
[[Category:Murder One]]
[[Category:Murder One]]
[[Category:TV Series]]

Latest revision as of 23:53, 4 October 2020

A Legal Drama like no other; The first series follows a single murder case across twenty three episodes, covering ground almost never seen in any other legal drama (several episodes are spent on the process of jury selection, for instance). The second series, with several key cast changes and a softening of the previous tight focus, was not as successful, but it's hardly devoid of interest.

Tropes used in Murder One include:

First series

  • Always Murder: Slightly averted in that several other trials, mostly not murders, are shown, mostly during the earlier episodes. But, well, it is right there in the title.
  • Amoral Attorney: The firm's lawyers often walk down the knife edge of acceptable behaviour, staying just out of this trope. One divorce lawyer that we meet, however, not only embodies this trope but gleefully embraces it.
    • The morality is made even greyer by the fact that, while defending people They may know to be murderers, the lawyers genuinely believe in what They are doing, that every individual deserves the best legal aid They can get.
  • Big Secret: An awful lot of people have them. They tend to be very closely related to the case, rather than being incidental.
  • Candlelit Bath: Not quite, but when we see inside the victim's appartment, it's lit entirely with candles.
  • Disregard That Statement: Frequently. We also see the reverse, with lawyers attempting to limit testimony and questioning in advance of the witness taking the stand because "you can't unring a bell weeks after it's been rung".
  • Good Lawyers, Good Clients: Nuh-uh. Teddy Hoffman, as played by Daniel Benzali, is a good lawyer, but he's not a Good Guy. Not a Bad Guy, either, mind you: He's in a class of his own. And although there are a few innocent people scattered about, most of the clients that Hoffman and Associates are seen to represent are guilty, and require good defense lawyers to get them the best possible deal, rather than a not-guilty verdict.
  • Hollywood Law: Put through a lengthy trial process, convicted, denied final appeals and executed.
  • Honor Before Reason: Ted and the firm are in the habit of representing clients known to be guilty or at least facing impossible odds because They believe its the right thing to do.
  • Law Procedural: to the extent that, apparently, law students were advised to watch it as it covered more stages of trial than any other series before or since.
  • Never One Murder: Although the series focuses tightly on the murder of Jessica Costello, people get killed in pursuit of the truth.
  • Screw the Money, I Have Rules: Played straight wit Ted's refusal to represent Jessica Costello's murderer for the sum of twenty million. After seeing how much damage He has caused, He tells him there isn't enough money in the world.
  • Screw the Rules, I Have Money: Averted, then played at full strength. Richard Cross has massive amounts of both money and connections, including being a financial supporter of the current DA. It doesn't do him a whole lot of good, initially, as everyone is keen to be seen not to be caving in to him. After everyone has demonstrated for the press and public just how unimpressed they are, things change.
  • Shout-Out: Hoffman and his associates often refer to an unseen "Ensalmo case," a running gag in Moonlighting.

Second series