Display title | Overshadowed by Controversy |
Default sort key | Overshadowed by Controversy |
Page length (in bytes) | 119,979 |
Namespace ID | 0 |
Page ID | 37691 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
Page creator | prefix>Import Bot |
Date of page creation | 21:27, 1 November 2013 |
Latest editor | Robkelk (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 23:14, 19 March 2023 |
Total number of edits | 243 |
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Transcluded templates (7) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | There are some well-known works that gathered controversy throughout the years, and there are also famously controversial works in which the controversy, whether rightful or not, would overshadow most other aspects. Which isn't to say that works in the latter category have no other redeeming factor, just that most people would know little else aside from the controversial aspects. |