Display title | Proper Lady |
Default sort key | Proper Lady |
Page length (in bytes) | 22,020 |
Namespace ID | 0 |
Page ID | 164514 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 2 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Number of subpages of this page | 2 (0 redirects; 2 non-redirects) |
Page image | |
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
Page creator | m>Import Bot |
Date of page creation | 21:27, 1 November 2013 |
Latest editor | Robkelk (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 01:42, 3 January 2023 |
Total number of edits | 23 |
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Transcluded templates (8) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | What is a Proper Lady? Also known as a "real lady", a "true lady", simply a "lady", or an "angel in the house" in Victorian-era works, she's the perfect lady in the Western (and especially Victorian British) mindset, and in that related to Yamato Nadeshiko, who is the perfect lady in the Japanese mindset. The two ideals share many, many qualities. A Proper Lady is like a mythical creature or an unattainable ideal, often referred to, but rarely seen. Actual Proper Lady characters are largely a Forgotten Trope by now, and modern ones are likely to be accused of being Purity Sues. However, Proper Ladies were widely used in Victorian and earlier literature. Jane Austen was one of the first authors that introduced such qualities to heroines that did not fit into the strictest view of what is acceptable of a Proper Lady, beginning the slow death of this trope. The last time it was seen alive was around the 1950's. |