Display title | Reciprocal Fiction Paradox |
Default sort key | Reciprocal Fiction Paradox |
Page length (in bytes) | 14,053 |
Namespace ID | 0 |
Page ID | 27475 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Page image | |
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
Page creator | prefix>Import Bot |
Date of page creation | 21:27, 1 November 2013 |
Latest editor | Robkelk (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 20:19, 2 February 2021 |
Total number of edits | 12 |
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Transcluded templates (5) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | The Reciprocal Fiction Paradox occurs when two different works reciprocate actions which establish each other as being fiction within their own respective 'verses. Characters might discuss a work, make a Shout-Out or Take That, or the work is shown as a piece of fiction in the show and then the other work does the same. The logic and consistency prone viewer may go "But if that A is shown in B and A has watched B then A has watched B watching A and...oh no, I've gone cross-eyed. How can this be?" |