Display title | Sliding Scale of Adaptation Modification |
Default sort key | Sliding Scale of Adaptation Modification |
Page length (in bytes) | 9,963 |
Namespace ID | 0 |
Page ID | 70815 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
Page creator | prefix>Import Bot |
Date of page creation | 21:27, 1 November 2013 |
Latest editor | Robkelk (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 17:19, 12 January 2023 |
Total number of edits | 27 |
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Transcluded templates (4) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | When creating a movie from a story already well-known in another medium, those making it are often faced with a crippling dilemma. How true can we stay to the source material without risking a failure at the box office? It can be a very hard call for a director. On the one hand, Fan Dumb will cry "Ruined FOREVER" should he change one iota of the source material, and he may find himself a victim of the fandom's ire from then on. On the other hand, not changing a thing can result in either a very poorly-made movie or one that relies so heavily on the source material that people unfamiliar with the work will be completely lost. |