Template:Logical Fallacies: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
* [[Existential fallacy]] |
* [[Existential fallacy]] |
||
* [[Modal scope fallacy]] |
* [[Modal scope fallacy]] |
||
* [[Fallacy of four terms]] |
* [[Four Terms Fallacy|Fallacy of four terms]] |
||
* [[Illicit major]] |
* [[Illicit major]] |
||
* [[Illicit minor]] |
* [[Illicit minor]] |
||
* [[Negative conclusion from affirmative premises]] |
* [[Negative conclusion from affirmative premises]] |
||
* [[Fallacy of the undistributed middle]] |
* [[Undistributed Middle|Fallacy of the undistributed middle]] |
||
}} |
}} |
||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
* [[Loki's Wager]] |
* [[Loki's Wager]] |
||
* [[No True Scotsman|No true Scotsman]] |
* [[No True Scotsman|No true Scotsman]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Hypostatization|Reification]] |
||
| group2 = Question-begging |
| group2 = Question-begging |
||
| list2 = |
| list2 = |
||
* [[Circular Reasoning|Circular reasoning]] / [[Begging the Question|Begging the question]] |
* [[Circular Reasoning|Circular reasoning]] / [[Begging the Question|Begging the question]] |
||
* [[Loaded language]] |
* [[Loaded Words|Loaded language]] |
||
** [[Leading question]] |
** [[Leading question]] |
||
* [[Double-barreled question|Compound question]] / [[Loaded question]] / [[Complex question]] |
* [[Double-barreled question|Compound question]] / [[Loaded question]] / [[Complex question]] |
||
* [[No true Scotsman]] |
* [[No True Scotsman|No true Scotsman]] |
||
| group3 = Correlative-based |
| group3 = Correlative-based |
||
| Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
* [[Moving the Goalposts|Moving the goalposts]] |
* [[Moving the Goalposts|Moving the goalposts]] |
||
* [[Quote Mine|Quoting out of context]] |
* [[Quote Mine|Quoting out of context]] |
||
* [[Slippery slope]] |
* [[Slippery Slope Fallacy|Slippery slope]] |
||
* [[Sorites paradox]] |
* [[Sorites paradox]] |
||
* [[Syntactic ambiguity]] |
* [[Syntactic ambiguity]] |
||
| Line 111: | Line 111: | ||
* [[Regression fallacy]] |
* [[Regression fallacy]] |
||
* [[Fallacy of the single cause]] |
* [[Fallacy of the single cause]] |
||
* [[Slippery slope]] |
* [[Slippery Slope Fallacy|Slippery slope]] |
||
* [[Texas sharpshooter fallacy]] |
* [[Sharpshooter Fallacy|Texas sharpshooter fallacy]] |
||
| group9 = Appeal to emotion |
| group9 = Appeal to emotion |
||
| Line 131: | Line 131: | ||
* [[Wisdom of repugnance]] |
* [[Wisdom of repugnance]] |
||
| group10 = Genetic fallacy |
| group10 = [[Genetic Fallacy|Genetic fallacy]] |
||
| list10 = |
| list10 = |
||
| Line 137: | Line 137: | ||
| group1 = ''[[Ad Hominem|Ad hominem]]'' |
| group1 = ''[[Ad Hominem|Ad hominem]]'' |
||
| list1 = |
| list1 = |
||
* [[Appeal to motive]] |
* [[Appeal to motive]]<!-- --> |
||
* [[Association fallacy]] |
* [[Association Fallacy|Association fallacy]] |
||
** ''[[Hitler Ate Sugar|Reductio ad Hitlerum]]'' |
** ''[[Hitler Ate Sugar|Reductio ad Hitlerum]]'' |
||
*** [[Godwin's Law|Godwin's law]] |
*** [[Godwin's Law|Godwin's law]] |
||
** ''[[Red-baiting]]'' |
** ''[[Red-baiting]]''<!-- --> |
||
* [[Bulverism]] |
* [[Bulverism]]<!-- Circular Reasoning meets Genetic Fallacy --> |
||
* [[Poisoning the well]] |
* [[Poisoning the well]]<!-- preemptive smearing of one's opponent --> |
||
* [[Tone policing]] |
* [[Tone policing]]<!-- criticizing one's opponent for expressing emotion --> |
||
* ''[[Tu quoque]]'' |
* ''[[Tu quoque]]'' |
||
* [[Whataboutism]] |
* [[Whataboutism]]<!-- answering a question with a different question --> |
||
| list2 = |
| list2 = |
||
* [[Argument from authority]] |
* [[Appeal to Authority|Argument from authority]] |
||
** [[Appeal to accomplishment]] |
** [[Appeal to accomplishment]]<!-- stating one's opponent has not accomplished what one has accomplished --> |
||
** ''[[Ipse dixit]]'' |
** ''[[Ipse dixit]]''<!-- "because I said so" --> |
||
** [[Argumentum ad lazarum]] (Poverty) / [[Appeal to Wealth|Argumentum ad crumenam]] |
** [[Argumentum ad lazarum]] (Poverty) / [[Appeal to Wealth|Argumentum ad crumenam]]<!-- "I'm right because I'm poor / rich" --> |
||
* [[Etymological fallacy]] |
* [[Etymological fallacy]]<!-- arguing about the meaning of a word used in one's opponent's argument --> |
||
* [[Appeal to nature]] |
* [[Appeal to nature]]<!-- claiming "natural" things are good _because_ they're "natural" --> |
||
* [[Appeal to tradition]] / [[Appeal to novelty]] |
* [[Appeal to Tradition|Appeal to tradition]] / [[Appeal to Novelty|Appeal to novelty]] |
||
** [[Chronological snobbery]] |
** [[Chronological snobbery]]<!-- "newer is better" --> |
||
}} |
}} |
||
| group11 = [[Appeal to Consequences|Appeal to consequences]] |
| group11 = [[Appeal to Consequences|Appeal to consequences]] |
||
| list11 = |
| list11 = |
||
* ''[[Argumentum ad baculum]]'' |
* ''[[Appeal to Force|Argumentum ad baculum]]'' |
||
* [[Wishful thinking]] |
* [[Wishful thinking]] |
||
| group12 = Other fallacies of relevance |
| group12 = Other fallacies of relevance |
||
| list12 = |
| list12 = |
||
* ''[[Ad nauseam]]'' |
* ''[[Argumentum Ad Nauseam|Ad nauseam]]'' |
||
** [[Sealioning]] |
** [[Sealioning]] |
||
* [[Argument to moderation]] |
* [[Argument to moderation]] |
||
| Line 179: | Line 179: | ||
* [[Motte-and-bailey fallacy]] |
* [[Motte-and-bailey fallacy]] |
||
* [[Rationalization]] |
* [[Rationalization]] |
||
* [[Red herring]] |
* [[Red Herring|Red herring]] |
||
** [[Two wrongs make a right]] |
** [[Two wrongs make a right]] |
||
* [[Special pleading]] |
* [[Special pleading]] |
||