Template:Logical Fallacies: Difference between revisions

Formal

In propositional logic	Affirming a disjunct Affirming the consequent Denying the antecedent Argument from fallacy Masked-man fallacy Mathematical fallacy
In quantificational logic	Existential fallacy Affirming the consequent Proof by example Quantifier shift
Syllogistic fallacy	Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise Fallacy of exclusive premises Existential fallacy Modal scope fallacy Fallacy of four terms Illicit major Illicit minor Negative conclusion from affirmative premises Fallacy of the undistributed middle

Informal

Equivocation

Question-begging

Correlative-based

[Illicit transference

Secundum quid

Faulty generalization

Ambiguity

Questionable cause

Appeal to emotion

Ad hominem	Appeal to motive Association fallacy Reductio ad Hitlerum Godwin's law Red-baiting Bulverism Poisoning the well Tone policing Tu quoque Whataboutism
Argument from authority Appeal to accomplishment Ipse dixit Argumentum ad lazarum (Poverty) / Argumentum ad crumenam Etymological fallacy Appeal to nature Appeal to tradition / Appeal to novelty Chronological snobbery

Other fallacies of relevance

This list of Logical Fallacies uses Wikipedia's names for the fallacies. Please do not change them.

@@ Line 58: / Line 58: @@
 ** [[Leading question]]
 * [[Double-barreled question|Compound question]] / [[Loaded question]] / [[Complex question]]
-* [[No true Scotsman]]
+* [[No True Scotsman|No true Scotsman]]
 | group3 = Correlative-based

Revision as of 15:12, 27 February 2023