Topic on Talk:Intended Audience Reaction

Why is this marked "No examples, please."?

5
Robkelk (talkcontribs)

The criteria for qualification are clear, so why no examples?

Looney Toons (talkcontribs)

No doubt this was an Example Sectionectomy that was imposed because the TVT admins were too lazy to deal with the potential example list. I have no problems with opening it up myself.

Labster (talkcontribs)

I don't know, maybe it was too omnipresent for examples? You can go ahead and open it up, but if you do, you need to seed the page with 5-10 examples.

I'm just worried about this one because it sounds suspiciously close to Author Intent (not a trope?), and all authors have intent. And all authors want the audience to react to their work. Maybe instead of an examples section we can have a link to Category:Work?

Looney Toons (talkcontribs)

>@Labster: I'm just worried about this one because it sounds suspiciously close to Author Intent (not a trope?)

Mm. Good point. I didn't look at it from that angle.

Robkelk (talkcontribs)

That makes sense, yes. Thanks.