(cur
prevtopic)
19:33, 8 August 2019. .Robkelk(talk | contribs)commented on "Nuke" (It's part of the style guide. We've had requests to look more different than TVTropes, and sticking to the style guide is one way to fulf...)
. .+188
(cur
prevtopic)
19:31, 8 August 2019. .Robkelk(talk | contribs)commented on "Nuke" (I'm not wild about pigeonholing works into alignment systems (I much prefer advantage/disadvantage systems :) ), but if people want this...)
. .+162
(cur
prevtopic)
19:27, 8 August 2019. .TBeholder(talk | contribs)commented on "Nuke" (Why do they need potholes? Perhaps innate superiority of "here" over "[2]" may be obvious to you, but it's not obvious to me.)
. .+125
(cur
prevtopic)
18:38, 8 August 2019. .Looney Toons(talk | contribs)commented on "Nuke" (Closer to launchable, but again, it's been two weeks since anyone worked on it, and the main text still needs cleanup -- at a quick glanc...)
. .+241
(cur
prevtopic)
12:31, 24 July 2019. .Robkelk(talk | contribs)commented on "Nuke" (Agreed with Looney Toons. On All The Tropes, the important part of the phrase "fan-speak trope" is the word "trope", and we have a specif...)
. .+446
(cur
prevtopic)
12:23, 24 July 2019. .Looney Toons(talk | contribs)commented on "Nuke" (Firstly, tropes in the Fan-Speak category are not automatically free of the need for examples. Secondly, why did you create it with the e...)
. .+1,097
(cur
prevtopic)
02:17, 23 July 2019. .Looney Toons(talk | contribs)commented on "Nuke" (Created 11 months ago, last significant work on it done 11 months ago, no examples at all, only default categories. Toss this one.)
. .+131