I started up something in my sandbox that I like the look of, but before I proceed any further, I'd like to know if it would "clear the threshold" and be 'worthy' enough of an article in the first place.
Topic on User talk:Derivative
I think the ROM hack would pass, because we have several dozen articles on them, being published works, I can't say the same about the self-imposed challenge.
If that's the case, then I can probably just fold tropes specific to the self-imposed challenge into the ROM hack's description as a means of explaining its origin.
Hopefully I can get a bit more input on that, but this is still a great answer to have. Thank you!
That would be my personal approach to, feel free to get a second opinion however on this.
I'll tag a few other people and see.
I wasn't aware that we had a threshold - other than "tropable", that is.
This was admittedly a force-of-habit question I posed, yeah.
I'll continue working on it in that event, then, though LT is still free to give input regardless if he wants.
It's reasonably well written, but I can't see how it fits into our classification schema. It's not a work, it's not a fundamental of story telling. it's not a creator. Would it be a Useful Note? Or Just for Fun? I'm not saying don't refine it, just that I can't see a place for it.
Per LT, if he focuses on the ROM hack, we can classify it as a work and be done with it.
Yeah, I'd already decided the route I was going, just that in the midst of paring it down to just the work, I didn't respond as immediately as I should've. Thank you all.
Judging by the edit history, the problems with the submit problem are likely connected with the 503 problems, which we are trying to solve.
Huh? No, I didn't have any problems submitting, I just left the window open forever like an idiot. :B