Topic on User talk:HLIAA14YOG

Can you please provide a little more information? Are they wrong, false or otherwise misleading? Wordiness by itself is no reason to revert.

@Labster @Looney Toons @GethN7 @Robkelk @QuestionableSanity @Derivative @SelfCloak

They certainly spread wrong information. They write long entries about one specific scene on the plot, raving and raving about how the protagonist's mom having sex with a random guy and everything is result of the affair.

First, she says the mom of the protagonist is abusive. In the very next sentence they say they aren't abusive, so the trope doesn't apply then, but still go through 200 words to explain how she made her son rape his stepmother years later by accident, despite the fact she had no way of knowing the kid would caught her cheating on her husband much less that would lead to her son becoming a raging misogynist that thinks every woman is a slut.

Second, they said there was an adaptation expansion of the sex scene of the beginning. I played the visual novel, the sex scene is pretty much the same. Well, except it's all animated instead of a static image.

They said she went through adaptational villainy, by saying she went from a minor character to main antagonist. That is also a lie, she still is just a minor character that only shows up in the prologue and does nothing antagonistic. She is certainly not a flawless person but isn't like she is telling her son to rape women. The main villain is the protagonist himself who is a rapist.

The scene described in "All For Nothing" and "Irony" is mom's unnamed lover making a sarcastic remark. She is cheating on her husband and he is joking that if she doesn't improve her oral sex methods her husband will cheat on her, that she will obviously doesn't care since she is cheating on her husband already. She isn't trying to be "better on sex" to prevent her husband of cheating on her.

"Buxom is Better" is if characters in-universe think large breasts makes a woman prettier. Nobody states that on this anime.

So he exaggerates two minor characters' roles in the plot and outright invent things. By what I've seen, he does that so he can write extremely lenghty descriptions of the sex scenes using the most graphical and obscene terms possible.

In that case, we have no problems with the deletions. Thank you. We'll keep a closer eye on his contributions in the future.