Information for "Villain Has a Point"

Basic information

Display titleVillain Has a Point
Default sort keyVillain Has a Point
Page length (in bytes)17,229
Namespace ID0
Page ID75292
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page1
Counted as a content pageYes
Number of subpages of this page1 (0 redirects; 1 non-redirect)

Page protection

EditAllow all users (infinite)
MoveAllow all users (infinite)
DeleteAllow all users (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorprefix>Import Bot
Date of page creation21:27, 1 November 2013
Latest editorLooney Toons (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit12:43, 10 October 2023
Total number of edits37
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

Page properties

Transcluded templates (6)

Templates used on this page:

SEO properties

Description

Content

Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
Time and time again a story is told with the classic hero vs. villain setup with the villain committing acts deemed evil by good, neutral, and the normally apathetic. The villain usually commits said acts for their own personal reasons. But wait, they have a justified reason for their actions? They may not be so much evil as they are anti. He may end up sending the hero into a depression after his motives come to light? Here my friends is a villain who actually has a justified reason for being what he is. Due to the nature of their villainy if they become too excessive in their methods it may fall under Straw Man Has a Point and they can easily fall under as a Well-Intentioned Extremist. In-universe they can also easily fall under Designated Villain. Compare Anti-Villain.
Information from Extension:WikiSEO