Information for "Science Is Bad"

Basic information

Display titleScience Is Bad
Default sort keyScience Is Bad
Page length (in bytes)77,061
Namespace ID0
Page ID148746
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page1
Counted as a content pageYes
Number of subpages of this page2 (0 redirects; 2 non-redirects)
Page image28157 895.jpg

Page protection

EditAllow all users (infinite)
MoveAllow all users (infinite)
DeleteAllow all users (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorm>Import Bot
Date of page creation21:27, 1 November 2013
Latest editorRobkelk (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit22:59, 5 March 2024
Total number of edits36
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days)1
Recent number of distinct authors1

Page properties

Transcluded templates (6)

Templates used on this page:

Lint errors

Missing end tag1
View detailed information on the lint errors.

SEO properties

Description

Content

Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
Writers are not scientists.[1] Whether it is because they perceive science as cold and emotionless, or because they just disliked science and embraced literature after failing math in high school, luddism is an awfully common philosophy in the arts community. The typical theme is that some sort of advanced scientific research has Gone Horribly Wrong, creating a monster, causing an impending natural disaster and/or a massive government cover-up. The heroes typically discover the side-effects of the research and investigate, discover what's going on, and try to stop it.
Information from Extension:WikiSEO