You do not get to be the arbiter of how other people react to something. Not here.
If we wanted somebody to tell other people how to think, we would have advertised for applicants years ago.
Even if you think that something is blatantly obvious, somebody else can completely miss what you see if it isn't explicitly stated.
@Utini501 @Labster @Looney Toons @GethN7 @Robkelk @QuestionableSanity @Derivative @SelfCloak
My apologies. I just thought someone looking at a bunch of inoffensively cute, cuddly little mole people that were obvious stand-ins for mountaineering hillbillies and assuming "OH MY GOD RACIST STEREOTYPES AGAINST BLACK PEOPLE" was a bit of a reach (or to be blunt, a really stupid conclusion that no sane person would ever jump to) and explained as much in my edit reason. I thought you could delete YMMV entries as long as you had a proper justification and that blanket removals with none whatsoever were what was frowned upon, but if I misunderstood the rules then I won't be doing that again.
The example didn't say anything about black people, it just trailed off. For all I knew, the person who added it was pointing out how they were like hillbillies... It's far too late to ask who the troper thought was being implied, and when in doubt it's best to assume good faith.
Thanks for the apology, and for being understanding.