(cur
prevtopic)
15:41, 27 September 2020. .Robkelk(talk | contribs)commented on "Your edit to "Magnificent Bastard/Video Games" has been reverted" (You removed without explanation works on a trope page. You have already been told by GethN7 while he was an admin "we don't accept that e...)
. .+744
(cur
prevtopic)
16:38, 16 February 2020. .GethN7(talk | contribs)commented on "Your edit to "Magnificent Bastard/Fire Emblem" has been reverted" (Pro-tip, we don't accept that edits you made at one location are viable under the exact same logic unless (A) their policies are the same...)
. .+197
(cur
prevtopic)
16:02, 16 February 2020. .Robkelk(talk | contribs)commented on "Your edit to "Magnificent Bastard/Fire Emblem" has been reverted" (Mainly because of the edit reason you gave: "removing poor examples (already happened in TTT" First, there is no rule at All The Tropes t...)
. .+842
(cur
prevtopic)
22:16, 12 October 2019. .DocColress(talk | contribs)commented on "Your consensus is needed here." (Lulzkiller is also undecided on this matter, though. But should the trope stay in-tact, I'd gladly start working with them.)
. .+123
(cur
prevtopic)
21:44, 12 October 2019. .DocColress(talk | contribs)commented on "Your consensus is needed here." (You're going to have to submit that "let's keep the category" to the proposition page in order for it to hold weight in the decision.)
. .+133
(cur
prevtopic)
20:59, 12 October 2019. .DocColress(talk | contribs)commented on "Your consensus is needed here." (And if you could, could you please consider leaning towards keeping the category? It means so much to me and for a lot of people, so taki...)
. .+283
(cur
prevtopic)
18:59, 12 October 2019. .DocColress(talk | contribs)commented on "Your consensus is needed here." (https://allthetropes.org/w/index.php?title=Topic:V91pddmvgrz9sl1u&topic_showPostId=v91zlrrq1d1qs6mq&fromnotif=1#flow-post-v91zlrrq1d1qs6m...)
. .+378
(cur
prevtopic)
20:01, 24 September 2019. .Mark D. Gordon(talk | contribs)commented on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" ("he was literally executing an incredibly heinous norm of his boss, and they're all slavers and torturers" "System Standards These standa...)
. .+1,711
(cur
prevtopic)
16:09, 24 September 2019. .Robkelk(talk | contribs)commented on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" (While Looney Toons could have been less sardonic, I do have to agree with the point raised. Admins don't have time to ask questions simpl...)
. .+182
(cur
prevtopic)
04:15, 24 September 2019. .Mark D. Gordon(talk | contribs)commented on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" (Looney Tunes: "The rules no longer support his inclusion" Whose rules are these? When did they change here? Who changed them? Please clar...)
. .+273
(cur
prevtopic)
23:43, 23 September 2019. .DocColress(talk | contribs)commented on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" (If the criteria for qualifying as an example of the trope, the criteria given on the page, doesn't support the inclusion of a character,...)
. .+1,658
(cur
prevtopic)
18:00, 23 September 2019. .HeneryVII(talk | contribs)commented on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" (Here's an excellent example of how that can happen: Malificent. Originally, she was on the list, as she met every criteria - crimes consi...)
. .+937
(cur
prevtopic)
16:41, 23 September 2019. .Robkelk(talk | contribs)commented on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" (This brings up a question, which I have asked here. If there are any current frequent contributors to the wiki who I did not mention, ple...)
. .+235
(cur
prevtopic)
16:21, 23 September 2019. .Looney Toons(talk | contribs)commented on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" ((From here.) Whose rules are these? When did they change here? Who changed them? Please clarify. -- Looney Toons, Admin CC: @Labster, @Ge...)
. .+435
(cur
prevtopic)
14:28, 9 September 2019. .DocColress(talk | contribs)commented on "Whenever you're back on here" (I know. I was meaning to say that most people on this Wiki seem to take the "We are not TV Tropes - we can be as informal and unprofessio...)
. .+184
(cur
prevtopic)
19:36, 8 September 2019. .DocColress(talk | contribs)commented on "Whenever you're back on here" (I'd like to ask something of you regarding this wiki's approach to some tropes. (Like, there has to be such a thing as being too informal.))
. .+143
(cur
prevtopic)
16:31, 24 July 2019. .Mark D. Gordon(talk | contribs)commented on "Your edit with the summary "new approved example"" (Sorry. I consider the wiki "formal". Although it says it isn't. I just want to prevent characters being randomly added. I think it's a ha...)
. .+167
(cur
prevtopic)
16:26, 24 July 2019. .Robkelk(talk | contribs)commented on "Your edit with the summary "new approved example"" (That isn't what I asked. The phrase "approved example" is an issue. Who gave the approval? Why was approval even needed?)
. .+121
(cur
prevtopic)
12:57, 24 July 2019. .Mark D. Gordon(talk | contribs)commented on "Your edit with the summary "new approved example"" (Okay, I think I should not do this without talking. Next time I mention it on a user's page.)
. .+93
(cur
prevtopic)
11:55, 24 July 2019. .Robkelk(talk | contribs)commented on "Your edit with the summary "new approved example"" (I see you have been online and have edited since I posted this request for information, but you have not replied. I am giving your accoun...)
. .+512
(cur
prevtopic)
11:52, 22 July 2019. .Robkelk(talk | contribs)commented on "Your edit with the summary "new approved example"" (I see you made this edit and gave the summary "new approved example". I was not aware that there was an approval process for contribution...)
. .+571