Talk:Intended Audience Reaction
- (cur prev topic) 03:53, 20 December 2016 . . Robkelk (talk | contribs) commented on "Why is this marked "No examples, please."?" (That makes sense, yes. Thanks.) . . +30
- (cur prev topic) 21:36, 19 December 2016 . . Looney Toons (talk | contribs) commented on "Why is this marked "No examples, please."?" (>@Labster: I'm just worried about this one because it sounds suspiciously close to Author Intent (not a trope?) Mm. Good point. I didn't...) . . +182
- (cur prev topic) 21:06, 19 December 2016 . . Labster (talk | contribs) commented on "Why is this marked "No examples, please."?" (I don't know, maybe it was too omnipresent for examples? You can go ahead and open it up, but if you do, you need to seed the page with 5...) . . +422
- (cur prev topic) 16:55, 19 December 2016 . . Looney Toons (talk | contribs) commented on "Why is this marked "No examples, please."?" (No doubt this was an Example Sectionectomy that was imposed because the TVT admins were too lazy to deal with the potential example list....) . . +188
- (cur prev topic) 12:36, 19 December 2016 . . Robkelk (talk | contribs) commented on "Why is this marked "No examples, please."?" (The criteria for qualification are clear, so why no examples?) . . +61