Given the recent thing about splitting the Overwatch supplement works into 52 pages, many for works under 5 minutes long, I figure I'd start a topic here. It seems really inefficient and inelegant to split things like short story collections or other anthology material released on the same banner. This kind of collection will naturally and purposefully have many recurring themes, characters, plots, and other elements that would lead to a lot of duplication.
I propose an amendment something like the following (exact text still adjustable)
"Works released as a collection (such as a book of short stories), serial publications, or works otherwise released under a single banner and meant to be consumed together may share a single page. Religion and Mythology (Classical Mythology) may also have a single page. Individual works within these (The Iliad) may have separate pages if a page creator is willing and able to make a full page for them on their own."
Some other examples of how silly this policy can get un-amended: Trying to split something like The Elder Scrolls: In-Universe Books would be crazy. Especially since multiple books have extremely vague names ("Thief", "Trap", "Bone"), or are deliberately meant to play off each other. The longest (by a significant margin) is the The 36 Lessons of Vivec at only 16,000 something words, while most are closer to ~1100.
There's at least twenty separate versions of King Arthur by separate authors and that's only counting the ones we can put an individual's name on the creation of. These have some seriously unreconcilable differences between authors (even the ones hired to complete another's work!). While Libeaus Desconus and Le Morte d'Arthur could be given their own page, trying to demand separation of Chestre and Malory is futile.
In-fact, the same can be said for a lot of comic books. Anyone who has read both will say "Stan Lee's X-Men" and "Chris Claremont's X-Men" are totally different things that just happen to share a (loose) canon and some characters (many of whom changed radically under Claremont).