User talk:GalaxySagi777

About this board

Not editable

We need your opinion

1
Looney Toons (talkcontribs)

The file you just uploaded...

2
Robkelk (talkcontribs)
Robkelk (talkcontribs)

Since the license information was not provided, the file has been deleted.

Congratulations!

2
Looney Toons (talkcontribs)

Because of your consistent good edits over the past few months as well as your willingness to take advice from the mods, the All The Tropes staff has chosen to give you autopatrolled status. As a result, your edits will now be applied directly to the wiki instead of going into the moderation queue for approval by one of the mods. It's an awesome responsibility that we're trusting you with. <grin>

Congratulations, and we look forward for more high-quality original contributions from you!

-- Looney Toons, admin

@Labster @Looney Toons @GethN7 @Robkelk @QuestionableSanity @Derivative @SelfCloak

GalaxySagi777 (talkcontribs)

Oh thank you!

Your proposed edit to "Glee/YMMV" has been rejected in moderation...

1
Looney Toons (talkcontribs)

... because some of your additions -- in particular this passage

Many of Puck's ships have turned into this because of what his actor did. This is especially effective on Quick (with their already messy relationship being taken more seriously).

are entirely too close to a word-for-word copy of content currently found on TV Tropes' Glee/YMMV page. This is copyright infringement as the material postdates the fork and TV Tropes' subsequent change of license in 2012. Because All The Tropes and TV Tropes run under different Creative Commons licenses, content created there after 2012 cannot legally be used here without the express written approval of all the editors who contributed to it.

Feel free to rewrite your edit in your own words and resubmit it. Just be aware that, as we have told other users, if your text and and TVT's are so close that a third party can look at them and say, "one is clearly a rewrite of the other", then you are going to run afoul of our Copyrights policy.

-- Looney Toons, admin

@Labster @Looney Toons @GethN7 @Robkelk @QuestionableSanity @Derivative @SelfCloak

Your proposed edit to "Carrie" has been rejected in moderation...

1
Looney Toons (talkcontribs)

...because it was entirely made up of tropes for the 2013 remake, despite the page being marked as needing to be broken out into separate pages for each version of the story. When a works page has the "Multiple Works Need Separate Pages" banner on it, do not compound the problem by ignoring the banner. Instead create a new works page for the version you want to document -- that would be Carrie (2013 film) -- and copy anything specific to it from the original page, and add your tropes there. (Oh, and link it off the original page so people can find it if they go there.)

-- Looney Toons, admin

@Labster @Looney Toons @GethN7 @Robkelk @QuestionableSanity @Derivative @SelfCloak

Your proposed new page "Spooky month" has passed moderation, but...

1
Looney Toons (talkcontribs)

... it was filled with markup errors including two conflicting and unnecessary DEFAULTSORT tags (one at either end of the page), content mangling of the kind commonly inflicted by the Visual Editor (which is why we strongly recommend that editors use the Source Editor instead), an extra page name at the top, as well as inexplicable use of MediaWiki "magic words" and multiple redundant categories. I've gone in and done a couple cleanup passes, as well as moved the page to a new name with proper capitalization (Spooky Month); you might want to check the page history to see what I've done for future reference. You might also want to check out our Works Page Guidelines, too.

That said, thank you for your contribution, and we apologize for taking so long to get it out of moderation.

-- Looney Toons, admin

@Labster @Looney Toons @GethN7 @Robkelk @QuestionableSanity @Derivative @SelfCloak

There are no older topics