I Resemble That Remark/Quotes: Difference between revisions
m (revise quote template spacing) |
Goo Monster (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{trope}} |
{{trope}} |
||
{{quote|'''Reporter''':Isn't it true that you're really an lndian? |
|||
'''Apu''':By the many arms of Vishnu, I swear it is a lie.|''[[The Simpsons (animation)]]''}} |
|||
{{quote|'''Pound''': Let's see what you got... ''(passes a basketball to Michael Jordan)'' ...chump! |
{{quote|'''Pound''': Let's see what you got... ''(passes a basketball to Michael Jordan)'' ...chump! |
||
'''Michael Jordan''': I don't play basketball anymore. |
'''Michael Jordan''': I don't play basketball anymore. |
||
'''Bang''': ''(exaggerating)'' [[Stealth Insult|I don't play basketball anymore!]] |
'''Bang''': ''(exaggerating)'' [[Stealth Insult|I don't play basketball anymore!]] |
||
''(The Monstars chuckle)'' |
''(The Monstars chuckle)'' |
||
'''Pound''': Maybe, you're chicken. Bawk! Baaawk! Bawk-bawk-bawk-baaawwwk! |
'''Pound''': Maybe, you're chicken. Bawk! Baaawk! Bawk-bawk-bawk-baaawwwk! |
||
'''Foghorn Leghorn''': I say, I resemble that remark!|''[[Space Jam]]''}} |
'''Foghorn Leghorn''': I say, I resemble that remark!|''[[Space Jam]]''}} |
||
Line 28: | Line 32: | ||
{{quote|''“Well no, but someone has to keep you alive while you go – without supervision the two of you are as likely to kill each other as you are to smite any demons, and Uriel can’t walk anywhere without hurting himself!”'' |
{{quote|''“Well no, but someone has to keep you alive while you go – without supervision the two of you are as likely to kill each other as you are to smite any demons, and Uriel can’t walk anywhere without hurting himself!”'' |
||
''“I can too!” Uriel protested, [[Defied Trope|being sure to stand still so he didn't prove Raphael right.]]''|''[[ |
''“I can too!” Uriel protested, [[Defied Trope|being sure to stand still so he didn't prove Raphael right.]]''|''[[Manchester Lost]]''}} |
||
{{quote|A communications group at Yale University has put out a video that seems to be a rebuttal to a [[Dilbert]] cartoon by [[Scott Adams]] poking fun at climate scientists and their misplaced confidence in models. The video is full of impressive-looking scientists talking about charts and data and whatnot. It probably cost a lot to make and certainly involved a lot of time and effort. The most amazing thing, however, is that it actually proves the points being made in the Dilbert cartoon. Rather than debunking the cartoon, the scientists acted it out in slow motion. |
|||
[...] Granted she isn’t bald and doesn’t have a little beard, but otherwise she is almost verbatim the scientist in the cartoon. |
|||
|''[https://www.cato.org/blog/dilbert-1-scientists-0 Dilbert 1, Scientists 0.]'' by '''Ross McKitrick''' (Cato Institute) }} |
|||
{{quote|Clearly the goal of this panel was for these three to give their politically incorrect opinions on a variety of topics and watch as as dumbass ideological college students [[Candid Camera Prank|prove their point for them]] by trying to censor them. And that’s exactly what happened every time one of them tried to make a valid point: |
|||
|''[http://turtleboysports.com/hippies-got-annihilated-at-trigger-warning-political-correctness-forum-at-umass-in-the-greatest-social-justice-warrior-beatdown-of-all-time/ Hippies Got Annihilated At Trigger Warning Political Correctness Forum At UMass In The Greatest Social Justice Warrior Beatdown Of All Time]'' by '''Turtleboy''' }} |
|||
{{quote|Allow me to explain why the presence of my slate on the Hugo nominations is so controversial. This is complicated and your time is valuable, so short explanation first, longer explanation if you care after. |
|||
Short Version: |
|||
# I said a chunk of the Hugo voters are biased toward the left, and put the author’s politics far ahead of the quality of the work. Those openly on the right are sabotaged. This was denied. |
|||
# So I got some right wingers on the ballot. |
|||
# The biased voters immediately got all outraged and mobilized to do exactly what I said they’d do. |
|||
# Point made. |
|||
|'''[[Larry Correia]]''', ''[http://monsterhunternation.com/2014/04/24/an-explanation-about-the-hugo-awards-controversy/ An explanation about the Hugo awards controversy]''}} |
|||
{{reflist}} |
{{reflist}} |
Latest revision as of 02:02, 24 March 2021
Reporter:Isn't it true that you're really an lndian? |
Pound: Let's see what you got... (passes a basketball to Michael Jordan) ...chump! |
Nanase: I can't believe it they have so much in common. |
Erik: (frowning) You are contradicting me again. |
<Pahalial> "ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge" - Charles Darwin |
<Fenris> My mom found me perusing bash.org and looking up quotes about incest, and was like OMG! |
“Well no, but someone has to keep you alive while you go – without supervision the two of you are as likely to kill each other as you are to smite any demons, and Uriel can’t walk anywhere without hurting himself!” |
A communications group at Yale University has put out a video that seems to be a rebuttal to a Dilbert cartoon by Scott Adams poking fun at climate scientists and their misplaced confidence in models. The video is full of impressive-looking scientists talking about charts and data and whatnot. It probably cost a lot to make and certainly involved a lot of time and effort. The most amazing thing, however, is that it actually proves the points being made in the Dilbert cartoon. Rather than debunking the cartoon, the scientists acted it out in slow motion. —Dilbert 1, Scientists 0. by Ross McKitrick (Cato Institute)
|
Clearly the goal of this panel was for these three to give their politically incorrect opinions on a variety of topics and watch as as dumbass ideological college students prove their point for them by trying to censor them. And that’s exactly what happened every time one of them tried to make a valid point: |
Allow me to explain why the presence of my slate on the Hugo nominations is so controversial. This is complicated and your time is valuable, so short explanation first, longer explanation if you care after.
|