I want to know your opinion on it. what is the rivalry between different fandoms in the genre "slasher"
Topic on User talk:Looney Toons
Not my scene, guy. I don't have to justify any page content to you -- you have to justify your changes to the existing content.
-- Looney Toons
CC: @Labster, @GethN7, @Robkelk, @QuestionableSanity, @Derivative, @SelfCloak
Looney Toons
that was not my question. i just want to know an opinion about it.
I think he's saying that he doesn't have an opinion on it. (I know that I don't.)
is there a rivalry between certain fandoms of slasher movies? here is my question. that's all!
Like I said, not my scene. I'm not into horror movies; I don't like scares or gore. I've got lots of friends who are, including one who's been in a couple (mostly as a zombie extra), so I get a bit by osmosis. But not enough to have an opinion.
me i hate superheroes movies, i hate men with underwear, i think it's pathetic.
do you valid my opinion about a rivalry between robocop and Terminator ?
to Robkelk
and you ? do you have one ?
No, I think the whole "rivalry" trope is silly - but I know that other people disagree with me. I'm not the right person to ask about this sort of thing.
why you think it's "silly" ?
Looney Toons
in which movies you've got friends in it ?
Looney Toons
i really want that those crappy movies like Avengers die one day, that's not cinema, that's bullshit. i hate those movies. i hate those "good moral" shit that these movies want you to believe
...Did you really write the passage you added some weeks back and just deleted? Because you are barely literate in these threads and that passage was very well-written -- to the point that it sounds like two different people.
As for my friend Jess, either I was wrong about the number of films she's been in, or IMDB only knows about one of them -- Zombie Hunters: City of the Dead. And I'm pretty sure it's got it wrong, as she was telling me about her extra roles as far back as 2009.
i'm not English, that's why i'm "barely literate" i use google traduction, sorry for the bad english
yes it was me, check on the "history" and you'll see, it was me
@77.207.75.83, I note that you are continuing to write perfunctory "X vs. Y" examples with heavy footnoting. We've requested once already that you write full descriptions of each alleged example and not use footnotes. Continuing as you have will be considered defiance of moderator request and vandalism, which will be grounds for a tempban and the deletion of your "contributions".
Please explicitly acknowledge what we are telling you -- write in this thread that you understand that you will be tempbanned or worse if you continue to add three-word "examples" with massive footnotes, and do not change your existing contributions to comply with moderator requests regarding style and content. If you do not respond as requested, you will be subject to a short "attention getting" tempban.
It is in your interests to reply.
-- Looney Toons, admin
CC: @Labster, @GethN7, @Robkelk, @QuestionableSanity, @Derivative, @SelfCloak
why you dont' want "footnote" ?
how do you want i explain that X and Z are rivals ?
For the third time, you write a paragraph describing it. How hard is that to understand? We don't want footnotes because they're lazy and unsightly, especially in the quantities you want to use them in.
You still have not acknowledged that you will be tempbanned for failing to adhere to the wiki style and content guidelines. You now have 24 hours to agree to follow the guidelines we've laid out here and start rewriting your contributions to fit. Failure will result in your tempban and the deletion of your contribution to the page.
We've been very patient about this, but there comes a time when it stops being "failure to understand on your part", and starts becoming "being a jerk" -- in violation of Item 1 of the Wiki's Terms of Service, to which you implicitly agreed when you started contributing to a page.
-- Looney Toons, admin
CC: @Labster, @GethN7, @Robkelk, @QuestionableSanity, @Derivative, @SelfCloak
i delete my contribution the, it's more easy.
you say that i will be banned ? but why ? i have deleted the part you Don't like !
First, the tempban warning was made a half-hour before your delete. And it was issued because you were ignoring requests regarding how you should write your contributions.
Second, we wanted you to improve your contribution, not delete it. "Improve" meaning, "turn each entry into a short paragraph explaining the rivalry, without resorting to footnotes". If you would rather delete your work than rewrite it to fit our style and content guidelines, that is your prerogative, but it was not the ideal resolution to the issue.