Talk:Short List

About this board

Not editable

Given how few examples there are here...

5
Looney Toons (talkcontribs)
Goo Monster (talkcontribs)

I don't think so. Maybe we should change the 2 entries max from a guideline to a rule.

Umbire the Phantom (talkcontribs)

Doesn't make much sense to make that a hard rule IMO, if there's already so few examples as is.

Robkelk (talkcontribs)
Looney Toons (talkcontribs)

Thank you, Rob, for clarifying my position.

Ready for Launch?

2
Goo Monster (talkcontribs)

We have 7 entries (if we include non-fiction).

Looney Toons (talkcontribs)

No one's said "no" in the last month, so I'm launching.

2dgirlfan (talkcontribs)

Does a list that's empty for emphasis count? e.g., "List of girls who looked better because of a tattoo. The end"

Looney Toons (talkcontribs)

I'd call that both comical and short.

Broader definition.

1
Goo Monster (talkcontribs)

I was thinking of explicitly broadening the list usage to also including being or described as a list (list format not being necessary).

I was also considering maybe we should get rid of the comical requirement.

I have a short list example or 2 that doesn't fit the current requirements. (One might fit and if it does it could be used as a page image).

There are no older topics