User talk:Mark D. Gordon
- (cur prev topic) 15:44, 27 September 2020 . . Robkelk (talk | contribs) edited a post on "Your edit to "Magnificent Bastard/Video Games" has been reverted" . . +96
- (cur prev topic) 15:43, 27 September 2020 . . Mark D. Gordon (talk | contribs) commented on "Your edit to "Magnificent Bastard/Video Games" has been reverted" (Sorry for removing.) . . +19
- (cur prev topic) 15:41, 27 September 2020 . . Robkelk (talk | contribs) commented on "Your edit to "Magnificent Bastard/Video Games" has been reverted" (You removed without explanation works on a trope page. You have already been told by GethN7 while he was an admin "we don't accept that e...) . . +744
- (cur prev topic) 11:15, 17 February 2020 . . Mark D. Gordon (talk | contribs) commented on "Your edit to "Magnificent Bastard/Fire Emblem" has been reverted" (Okay. (TTT means The True Tropes btw.)) . . +38
- (cur prev topic) 16:38, 16 February 2020 . . GethN7 (talk | contribs) commented on "Your edit to "Magnificent Bastard/Fire Emblem" has been reverted" (Pro-tip, we don't accept that edits you made at one location are viable under the exact same logic unless (A) their policies are the same...) . . +197
- (cur prev topic) 16:02, 16 February 2020 . . Robkelk (talk | contribs) commented on "Your edit to "Magnificent Bastard/Fire Emblem" has been reverted" (Mainly because of the edit reason you gave: "removing poor examples (already happened in TTT" First, there is no rule at All The Tropes t...) . . +842
- (cur prev topic) 20:36, 13 October 2019 . . Robkelk (talk | contribs) restored the topic "Your consensus is needed here." (reopened) . . 0
- (cur prev topic) 05:24, 13 October 2019 . . DocColress (talk | contribs) marked the topic "Your consensus is needed here." as resolved (marked as resolved) . . 0
- (cur prev topic) 01:32, 13 October 2019 . . DocColress (talk | contribs) commented on "Your consensus is needed here." (You're welcome and thank you too. Let's both hope for the best, less drastic outcome.) . . +85
- (cur prev topic) 22:51, 12 October 2019 . . Mark D. Gordon (talk | contribs) commented on "Your consensus is needed here." (Thank you. Have a nice day (or remaining night). (10.50 pm by Wiki standards)) . . +77
- (cur prev topic) 22:16, 12 October 2019 . . DocColress (talk | contribs) commented on "Your consensus is needed here." (Lulzkiller is also undecided on this matter, though. But should the trope stay in-tact, I'd gladly start working with them.) . . +123
- (cur prev topic) 22:13, 12 October 2019 . . Mark D. Gordon (talk | contribs) commented on "Your consensus is needed here." (I understand. Then just try to team up with some of the other users. User:LulzKiller seems like an active enough user.) . . +119
- (cur prev topic) 21:46, 12 October 2019 . . DocColress (talk | contribs) commented on "Your consensus is needed here." (So did I, but look at what good that did me. Working alone has only led me to trouble in the long run.) . . +102
- (cur prev topic) 21:45, 12 October 2019 . . DocColress (talk | contribs) commented on "Your consensus is needed here." (So did I, but look at what good that did me. Working alone has only led me to trouble in the long run.) . . +102
- (cur prev topic) 21:44, 12 October 2019 . . DocColress (talk | contribs) commented on "Your consensus is needed here." (You're going to have to submit that "let's keep the category" to the proposition page in order for it to hold weight in the decision.) . . +133
- (cur prev topic) 21:38, 12 October 2019 . . Mark D. Gordon (talk | contribs) edited a post on "Your consensus is needed here." . . +21
- (cur prev topic) 21:37, 12 October 2019 . . Mark D. Gordon (talk | contribs) commented on "Your consensus is needed here." (Sorry for dismissing, but I'd rather like to work alone.) . . +56
- (cur prev topic) 21:35, 12 October 2019 . . Mark D. Gordon (talk | contribs) commented on "Your consensus is needed here." (Okay, let's keep the category.) . . +30
- (cur prev topic) 20:59, 12 October 2019 . . DocColress (talk | contribs) commented on "Your consensus is needed here." (And if you could, could you please consider leaning towards keeping the category? It means so much to me and for a lot of people, so taki...) . . +283
- (cur prev topic) 18:59, 12 October 2019 . . DocColress (talk | contribs) commented on "Your consensus is needed here." (https://allthetropes.org/w/index.php?title=Topic:V91pddmvgrz9sl1u&topic_showPostId=v91zlrrq1d1qs6mq&fromnotif=1#flow-post-v91zlrrq1d1qs6m...) . . +378
- (cur prev topic) 02:56, 25 September 2019 . . Mark D. Gordon (talk | contribs) edited a post on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" . . +49
- (cur prev topic) 00:18, 25 September 2019 . . Mark D. Gordon (talk | contribs) edited a post on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" . . +2,594
- (cur prev topic) 00:13, 25 September 2019 . . Robkelk (talk | contribs) edited topic summary on "The rules no longer support his inclusion" . . +111
- (cur prev topic) 00:12, 25 September 2019 . . Robkelk (talk | contribs) restored the topic ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" (reopened) . . 0
- (cur prev topic) 22:04, 24 September 2019 . . Mark D. Gordon (talk | contribs) created topic summary on "The rules no longer support his inclusion" . . +6
- (cur prev topic) 22:04, 24 September 2019 . . Mark D. Gordon (talk | contribs) marked the topic ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" as resolved (marked as resolved) . . 0
- (cur prev topic) 22:03, 24 September 2019 . . Mark D. Gordon (talk | contribs) edited a post on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" . . −2,594
- (cur prev topic) 20:13, 24 September 2019 . . Mark D. Gordon (talk | contribs) edited a post on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" . . +886
- (cur prev topic) 20:01, 24 September 2019 . . Mark D. Gordon (talk | contribs) commented on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" ("he was literally executing an incredibly heinous norm of his boss, and they're all slavers and torturers" "System Standards These standa...) . . +1,711
- (cur prev topic) 16:09, 24 September 2019 . . Robkelk (talk | contribs) commented on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" (While Looney Toons could have been less sardonic, I do have to agree with the point raised. Admins don't have time to ask questions simpl...) . . +182
- (cur prev topic) 12:35, 24 September 2019 . . Looney Toons (talk | contribs) commented on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" (Oh, so generous of you to let an admin know that you don't need to answer his questions.) . . +88
- (cur prev topic) 04:16, 24 September 2019 . . Mark D. Gordon (talk | contribs) edited a post on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" . . +5
- (cur prev topic) 04:15, 24 September 2019 . . Mark D. Gordon (talk | contribs) commented on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" (Looney Tunes: "The rules no longer support his inclusion" Whose rules are these? When did they change here? Who changed them? Please clar...) . . +273
- (cur prev topic) 01:34, 24 September 2019 . . HeneryVII (talk | contribs) commented on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" (Sorry.) . . +6
- (cur prev topic) 01:34, 24 September 2019 . . HeneryVII (talk | contribs) edited a post on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" . . 0
- (cur prev topic) 23:43, 23 September 2019 . . DocColress (talk | contribs) commented on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" (If the criteria for qualifying as an example of the trope, the criteria given on the page, doesn't support the inclusion of a character,...) . . +1,658
- (cur prev topic) 18:00, 23 September 2019 . . HeneryVII (talk | contribs) commented on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" (Here's an excellent example of how that can happen: Malificent. Originally, she was on the list, as she met every criteria - crimes consi...) . . +937
- (cur prev topic) 17:49, 23 September 2019 . . GethN7 (talk | contribs) commented on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" (For once, that's a pretty valid point, see my answer on Rob's topic for more details.) . . +85
- (cur prev topic) 16:41, 23 September 2019 . . Robkelk (talk | contribs) commented on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" (This brings up a question, which I have asked here. If there are any current frequent contributors to the wiki who I did not mention, ple...) . . +235
- (cur prev topic) 16:22, 23 September 2019 . . Looney Toons (talk | contribs) edited a post on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" . . −28
- (cur prev topic) 16:21, 23 September 2019 . . Looney Toons (talk | contribs) commented on ""The rules no longer support his inclusion"" ((From here.) Whose rules are these? When did they change here? Who changed them? Please clarify. -- Looney Toons, Admin CC: @Labster, @Ge...) . . +435
- (cur prev topic) 14:28, 9 September 2019 . . DocColress (talk | contribs) commented on "Whenever you're back on here" (I know. I was meaning to say that most people on this Wiki seem to take the "We are not TV Tropes - we can be as informal and unprofessio...) . . +184
- (cur prev topic) 04:20, 9 September 2019 . . Mark D. Gordon (talk | contribs) commented on "Whenever you're back on here" (Okay, I try my best in being more formal.) . . +41
- (cur prev topic) 19:36, 8 September 2019 . . DocColress (talk | contribs) commented on "Whenever you're back on here" (I'd like to ask something of you regarding this wiki's approach to some tropes. (Like, there has to be such a thing as being too informal.)) . . +143
- (cur prev topic) 16:32, 24 July 2019 . . Mark D. Gordon (talk | contribs) edited a post on "Your edit with the summary "new approved example"" . . −56
- (cur prev topic) 16:31, 24 July 2019 . . Mark D. Gordon (talk | contribs) commented on "Your edit with the summary "new approved example"" (Sorry. I consider the wiki "formal". Although it says it isn't. I just want to prevent characters being randomly added. I think it's a ha...) . . +167
- (cur prev topic) 16:26, 24 July 2019 . . Robkelk (talk | contribs) commented on "Your edit with the summary "new approved example"" (That isn't what I asked. The phrase "approved example" is an issue. Who gave the approval? Why was approval even needed?) . . +121
- (cur prev topic) 12:57, 24 July 2019 . . Mark D. Gordon (talk | contribs) commented on "Your edit with the summary "new approved example"" (Okay, I think I should not do this without talking. Next time I mention it on a user's page.) . . +93
- (cur prev topic) 11:55, 24 July 2019 . . Robkelk (talk | contribs) commented on "Your edit with the summary "new approved example"" (I see you have been online and have edited since I posted this request for information, but you have not replied. I am giving your accoun...) . . +512
- (cur prev topic) 11:52, 22 July 2019 . . Robkelk (talk | contribs) commented on "Your edit with the summary "new approved example"" (I see you made this edit and gave the summary "new approved example". I was not aware that there was an approval process for contribution...) . . +571