Apology (Plato): Difference between revisions

Everything About Fiction You Never Wanted to Know.
Content added Content deleted
m (Mass update links)
m (Reverted edits by Gethbot (talk) to last revision by Robkelk)
Tag: Rollback
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{work}}
{{work}}
{{Infobox book
[[File:socratest_6838.png|frame|Come hither, Meletus, and let me ask a question of you.]]
| title = Apology of Socrates
| original title = Ἀπολογία Σωκράτους
| image = socratest_6838.png
| caption = Come hither, Meletus, and let me ask a question of you.
| author = Plato
| central theme =
| elevator pitch = A fictionalized account of Socrates' defense against charges of corrupting the young people of the city and impiety against [[Classical Mythology|the pantheon of Athens]]
| genre = Socratic dialogue
| publication date = circa 399-390 BCE
| source page exists =
| wiki URL =
| wiki name =
}}
{{quote|''I will begin at the beginning, and ask what the accusation is which has given rise to this slander of me, and which has encouraged Meletus to proceed against me. What do the slanderers say? (...) "Socrates is an evil-doer, and a curious person, who searches into things under the earth and in heaven, and he makes the worse appear the better cause; and he teaches the aforesaid doctrines to others."''}}


One of [[Plato]]'s dialogues, the '''''Apology''''' (like all works by Plato) takes place in [[Ancient Greece|Greece in 399 BC]], being written a little bit later. It describes the famous trial of [[Socrates]], performed in Athens after he was accused of blasphemy and [[Think of the Children|corruption of youth]]. The degree in which it reflects the real event is debatable, but the trial must have had many witnesses (with Plato most probably being one of them), who could help establish the accurate version of all three speeches. Nonetheless, the dialogue is impressive by itself because of its literary value. Of all Plato's dialogues, this one is used as a translating exercise by the students of classical Greek most often, because it is relatively easy to read and very well-written (with numerous examples of famous [[Irony|Socratic irony]]) at the same time.


Apart from being one of the oldest examples of the [[Law Procedural]] genre in history, it is an important ethical work, discussing the significance of truth in ethics and the real meaning of death. Although, as with all dialogues written by Plato, it is debatable in what degree it describes the historical Socrates instead of being an [[Author Tract]], it is usually acknowledged to be one of the earliest Plato's texts, which mean there is a good chance that the Socrates from ''Apology'' expresses his own views (in the latter case it may be the case when [[Shaming the Mob]] did not work). Some interpreters say that the dialogue, along with a few other Plato's works, [[Everyone Is Jesus in Purgatory|foreshadows Christian ethics and eschatology]]. As Socrates himself says: God only knows.
{{quote| ''I will begin at the beginning, and ask what the accusation is which has given rise to this slander of me, and which has encouraged Meletus to proceed against me. What do the slanderers say? (...) "Socrates is an evil-doer, and a curious person, who searches into things under the earth and in heaven, and he makes the worse appear the better cause; and he teaches the aforesaid doctrines to others."''}}


{{tropenamer}}
One of Plato's dialogues, the ''Apology'' (like all works by [[Plato]]) takes place in [[Ancient Greece|Greece in the 5th century BC]], being written a little bit later. It describes the famous trial of [[Socrates]], performed in Athens after he was accused of blasphemy and [[Think of the Children|corruption of youth]]. The degree in which it reflects the real event is debatable, but the trial must have had many witnesses (with Plato most probably being one of them), who could help establish the accurate version of all three speeches. Nonetheless, the dialogue is impressive by itself because of its literary value. Of all Plato's dialogues, this one is used as a translating exercise by the students of classical Greek most often, because it is relatively easy to read and very well-written (with numerous examples of famous [[Irony|Socratic irony]]) at the same time.
* [[The Gadfly]]: Socrates compares his relationship to the Athenian democracy to that of a gadfly pestering a horse.


{{tropelist}}
Apart from being one of the oldest examples of the [[Law Procedural]] genre in history, it is an important ethical work, discussing the significance of truth in ethics and the real meaning of death. Although, as with all dialogues written by Plato, it is debatable in what degree it describes the historical Socrates instead of being an [[Author Tract]], it is usually acknowledged to be one of the earliest Plato's texts, which mean there is a good chance that the Socrates from ''Apology'' expresses his own views (in the latter case it may be the case when [[Shaming the Mob]] did not work). Some interpreters say that the dialogue, along with a few other Plato's works, [[Everyone Is Jesus in Purgatory|foreshadows Christian ethics and eschatology]]. As Socrates himself says: God only knows.
----
=== ''The Apology of Socrates'' provides examples of the following tropes: ===
* [[Appeal to Pity]]: Averted. This is what the accusers expected Socrates to do, and if he did, it would most probably save him (even though he would lose his authority over the Athenians), but he [[Honor Before Reason|preferred to risk his life]] than humiliate himself in public.
* [[Appeal to Pity]]: Averted. This is what the accusers expected Socrates to do, and if he did, it would most probably save him (even though he would lose his authority over the Athenians), but he [[Honor Before Reason|preferred to risk his life]] than humiliate himself in public.
* [[Chewbacca Defense]]: Socrates does this many times, often using [[Appeal to Ridicule]].
* [[Chewbacca Defense]]: Socrates does this many times, often using [[Appeal to Ridicule]].
Line 16: Line 30:
* [[Disproportionate Retribution]]: Scholars still debate over the actual reason of Socrates' trial, though - it might have been more or less connected with politics rather than philosophy, in which case 'corrupting youths' would mean actively encouraging the rule of aristocracy rather than democratic government.
* [[Disproportionate Retribution]]: Scholars still debate over the actual reason of Socrates' trial, though - it might have been more or less connected with politics rather than philosophy, in which case 'corrupting youths' would mean actively encouraging the rule of aristocracy rather than democratic government.
* [[Don't You Dare Pity Me!]]: Socrates. Even more so in ''Phaedo'', but the tendency is obvious already in the ''Apology''.
* [[Don't You Dare Pity Me!]]: Socrates. Even more so in ''Phaedo'', but the tendency is obvious already in the ''Apology''.
* [[Downer Beginning]]: Along with...
* [[Downer Beginning]]: Along with [[Downer Ending]].
* ...DownerEnding
* [[Eccentric Mentor]]: Socrates to many of the people present. He lampshades it in his defensive speech.
* [[Eccentric Mentor]]: Socrates to many of the people present. He lampshades it in his defensive speech.
* [[Good Feels Good]]: Socrates believes this.
* [[Good Feels Good]]: Socrates believes this.
{{quote| '''Socrates:''' No evil can happen to a good man, either in life or after death.}}
{{quote|'''Socrates:''' No evil can happen to a good man, either in life or after death.}}
* [[The Gadfly]]: [[Trope Namer]]: Socrates compares his relationship to the Athenian democracy to that of a gadfly pestering a horse.
* [[Hearing Voices]]: The way Socrates contacts with his mysterious inner spirit.
* [[Hearing Voices]]: The way Socrates contacts with his mysterious inner spirit.
* [[I Won't Say I'm Guilty]]: Even though his friends persuaded him to do so (see ''Criton'').
* [[I Won't Say I'm Guilty]]: Even though his friends persuaded him to do so (see ''Criton'').
Line 28: Line 40:
* [[Miscarriage of Justice]]: One of the best known in history.
* [[Miscarriage of Justice]]: One of the best known in history.
* [[Moral Guardians]]: Socrates' accusers.
* [[Moral Guardians]]: Socrates' accusers.
* [[Motive Rant]]: Socrates had no choice but to constantly annoy the Athenians by proving them their stupidity, because he was told by a god to do so. However, it turns out that [[It Sucks to Be The Chosen One]].
* [[Motive Rant]]: Socrates had no choice but to constantly annoy the Athenians by proving them their stupidity, because he was told by a god to do so. However, it turns out that [[It Sucks to Be the Chosen One]].
* [[Not Afraid to Die]]: One of Socrates' reasons is that [[We All Die Someday]], and you never know when [[Life Will Kill You]].
* [[Not Afraid to Die]]: One of Socrates' reasons is that [[We All Die Someday]], and you never know when [[Life Will Kill You]].
* [[Older Than Feudalism]]: By 800 to 1000 years.
* [[Older Than Feudalism]]: By 800 to 1000 years.
Line 36: Line 48:
* [[Real Person Fic]]: Like every Plato's dialogue.
* [[Real Person Fic]]: Like every Plato's dialogue.
* [[Seeker Archetype]]: Socrates, the seeker of truth.
* [[Seeker Archetype]]: Socrates, the seeker of truth.
* [[Unaccustomed As I Am to Public Speaking]]: This is how Socrates poses himself in his beginning words, when he says that he is a first-time defendant and does not even know proper terminology used during the trials.
* [[Unaccustomed as I Am to Public Speaking]]: This is how Socrates poses himself in his beginning words, when he says that he is a first-time defendant and does not even know proper terminology used during the trials.
* [[Victorious Loser]]: And a [[Doomed Moral Victor]], no less.
* [[Victorious Loser]]: And a [[Doomed Moral Victor]], no less.


{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Classic Literature]]
[[Category:Literature of the 4th century BCE]]
[[Category:Apology Of Socrates]]
[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:Literature]]
[[Category:Literature]]
[[Category:Greek Literature]]

Latest revision as of 14:40, 13 July 2021

Apology of Socrates
Come hither, Meletus, and let me ask a question of you.
Original Title: Ἀπολογία Σωκράτους
Written by: Plato
Central Theme:
Synopsis: A fictionalized account of Socrates' defense against charges of corrupting the young people of the city and impiety against the pantheon of Athens
Genre(s): Socratic dialogue
First published: circa 399-390 BCE
v · d · e

I will begin at the beginning, and ask what the accusation is which has given rise to this slander of me, and which has encouraged Meletus to proceed against me. What do the slanderers say? (...) "Socrates is an evil-doer, and a curious person, who searches into things under the earth and in heaven, and he makes the worse appear the better cause; and he teaches the aforesaid doctrines to others."

One of Plato's dialogues, the Apology (like all works by Plato) takes place in Greece in 399 BC, being written a little bit later. It describes the famous trial of Socrates, performed in Athens after he was accused of blasphemy and corruption of youth. The degree in which it reflects the real event is debatable, but the trial must have had many witnesses (with Plato most probably being one of them), who could help establish the accurate version of all three speeches. Nonetheless, the dialogue is impressive by itself because of its literary value. Of all Plato's dialogues, this one is used as a translating exercise by the students of classical Greek most often, because it is relatively easy to read and very well-written (with numerous examples of famous Socratic irony) at the same time.

Apart from being one of the oldest examples of the Law Procedural genre in history, it is an important ethical work, discussing the significance of truth in ethics and the real meaning of death. Although, as with all dialogues written by Plato, it is debatable in what degree it describes the historical Socrates instead of being an Author Tract, it is usually acknowledged to be one of the earliest Plato's texts, which mean there is a good chance that the Socrates from Apology expresses his own views (in the latter case it may be the case when Shaming the Mob did not work). Some interpreters say that the dialogue, along with a few other Plato's works, foreshadows Christian ethics and eschatology. As Socrates himself says: God only knows.

Apology (Plato) is the Trope Namer for:
  • The Gadfly: Socrates compares his relationship to the Athenian democracy to that of a gadfly pestering a horse.
Tropes used in Apology (Plato) include:

Socrates: No evil can happen to a good man, either in life or after death.