Talk:Plot-Driving Secret

About this board

Not editable

What more needs to be said?

7
Looney Toons (talkcontribs)

I'm not sure why this was sent back into the Workshop, as there's clearly no discussion here on the talk page about it. While yes, it could use a few more examples, it does have more than the minimum, and the main text is both concise and clear. I'm not sure this actually needs to be in the Workshop, and I move to put it back in Main.

Pinging the Usual Suspects: @Agiletek @GentlemensDame883 @Goo Monster @HeneryVII @HornyLikeIAmA14YearOldGirl @Lequinni‎ @RivetVermin @Umbire the Phantom @Utini501 @Labster @Looney Toons @GethN7 @Robkelk @QuestionableSanity @Derivative @SelfCloak

GentlemensDame883 (talkcontribs)

The description feels a bit short to me, but I'm not sure what else can be added. The version in the other place is equally short, for what it's worth.

Lequinni (talkcontribs)

The description isn't short, is concise and precise. In fact, I was the one that expanded the previous description to make it clearer, and even as long-winded as I am, I couldn't make the description longer.

What I think is that it lack examples, but besides the Derecho de Nacer one I cannot remember more right now

GethN7 (talkcontribs)

Concur with LT on this, we can send it back to Main.

Looney Toons (talkcontribs)
GentlemensDame883 (talkcontribs)

It's a "yes", that's correct.

Looney Toons (talkcontribs)

Okay, that's three "yes" votes and no explicit objections, so back to Main it goes.

There are no older topics