Talk:Literally Fearless

Page currently has six examples from three contributors., and is categorized. Description is short, but the there's not really much to describe.

A bump on this question since there haven't been any responses. Don't know if it's appropriate or how to do the ping regulars+admins thing.

Pings (I hope I'm doing this right, apologies if ping is inappropriate) @Bauerbach @Dominicmgm @GentlemensDame883 @H-Games~Documentation @HelljmprRookie @HeneryVII @HornyLikeIAmA14YearOldGirl @Jlaw @Just a 1itt1e bit further @Kuma @Lequinni‎ @RivetVermin @Tad Cipher @The23rdCamper @TheEric132 @Umbire the Phantom @Utini501 @Xemylixa @Labster @GethN7 @Robkelk@QuestionableSanity @SelfCloak@Derivative

The page description is still a bit sparse, but I don't know what to add to it.

Can we come up with a few more examples, though? Six examples is a good start, but it's a start. I'd prefer at least ten before launching. (I've already added the one example that I remembered.)

I've added three examples. How do they look?

They look good, thanks,

Vote to launch.

Vote to launch!

I have way less problems with the writing here than other candidates I'm looking at. My "grammar pass" only ended up deleting a few words, so I'm voting yes!

I'm okay with launching this.

Added an example, so we're up to ten now. Description still feels a little short, but I suppose there's no reason to over-complicate it. I vote to launch

The vote's been running for three days now, with unanimous agreement to launch. Last chance to vote against...

Voting to launch. Not sure how to further improve on it.

Launching.

EDIT, 30 minutes later: Launched and entry-pimped. That was a fast launch.