According to Wikipedia, widget has at least eight different real-world meanings - none of which are remotely connected to the trope currently named Widget Series.
Does anyone have a suggestion to rename the trope?
Esoteric but in actual use in Real Life, so not changed.
According to Wikipedia, widget has at least eight different real-world meanings - none of which are remotely connected to the trope currently named Widget Series.
Does anyone have a suggestion to rename the trope?
Apparently it's just a short hand of Weird Japanese Thing just like Teal Deer can be considered short hand for TL;DR.
Either rename it to that, or find something that you find less dismissive of Japan.
If we rename the page to "Weird Japanese Thing", then we'll need another page for all the non-Japanese examples that are currently there.
Trope candidate was accepted and can be found at True Art Is Realistic
https://allthetropes.org/wiki/Trope_Workshop:True_Art_Is_Realistic
Hey, ya guys, don't forget to add some really good examples for this trope. I'm dreading that it's being forgotten.
IIRC, that's on our "Restore" list -- I'll bet you we can safely harvest everything off a copy of the original page from the Wayback Machine. I'll have to look tonight when I get back from work.
And done. By the way, if I had realized you were in the process of recreating a page deleted before the fork, I would have told you that you had no need to rephrase things or put it in the workshop. Those pages are fair game for complete word-for-word recreation directly into the wiki, as they are still covered by the old license. As such, I'm going to launch this page after I'm done here.
Oh, you didn't do anything wrong -- you just made more work for yourself than you needed to.
We don't. Page was deleted as TVTropes tomfoolery.
A self-demonstrating page for Word Salad, and a nearly-identically-named page for an imaginary work that makes almost as little sense?
Unless there's some secret meaning to "Jungian Telomere Teleport Plunk Spot Number Nine" that I'm unaware of...
Fnord.
But seriously, my vote's to toss the self-demonstrating word-salad pages as we find them.
Found the only reference to this "work": http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=aaz27la7wplbqf441u101e1w&page=1
So, yeah, this is confirmed as TVTropes tomfoolery. And we already have a policy regarding that.
> page for an imaginary work
The guidelines are "userspace or nowhere", IIRC?
Yes, except for things like that bogus animated Anne Frank movie and its million subpages, which I got jumped on for deleting a few years back. (Odd -- even though it got restored, I can't find it now.)
Trope candidate was was deleted as a duplicate.
https://allthetropes.org/wiki/Trope_Workshop:Complicated_Possibly-Requited_Love
Hey, guys, I don't forget to add more examples here as well.
One trope candidate was accepted, the other was deleted as a duplicate.
Need help on these, since I'm not sure if I'm doing these tropes right.
https://allthetropes.org/wiki/Trope_Workshop:Cool_Scars
https://allthetropes.org/wiki/Trope_Workshop:Complicated_Possibly-Requited_Love
Trope candidate has been accepted and can now be found at Forgettable Character
Hey, I was trying to clean this up, so it won't sound like Tv Tropes. So, what do you think? I'm trying to type the article in my own words and try to carry over the idea. Link: Trope Workshop:Forgettable Character
Trope candidate has been tweaked and accepted, and can now be found at Forgettable Character
Hey, I just came back to working on this trope page to clean up my messes. I am adding to it, does it read a little bit better? Trope Workshop:Forgettable Character
Trope candidate has been accepted and is now found at Corner Cover
Need help with this one, since it needs more examples: https://allthetropes.org/wiki/Trope_Workshop:Corner_Cover
Anyone know why Corner Cover isn't listed in Category:Trope Workshop? Makes me wonder what other Trope Workshop type stuff isn't listed.
Trope has been renamed to Non Sequitur Scene.
I had bumped into this trope several times and eventually started to remember it by how I could never remember what it was.
So go ahead and try to guess what Big Lipped Alligator Moment could be.
I suggest for the trope name to be changed to BLAM Moment
You have a good point, but naming it BLAM Moment would be redundant (Big Lipped Alligator Moment Moment)
I don't have good names at the moment.
It was an acronym? I was thinking (because even though I had read the trope description, my brain has shown incredible resistance to the name of that one trope) that BLAM Episode was named after a sound effect like Wham! Episode. (Was the punctuation and capitalization of the latter changed recently? I seem to remember it having been patterned exactly like the former, but I may be wrong.)
I think the sound effect works decently enough. I don't have any idea what else to call the trope. If it gets named something else, that sister trope should be renamed too for consistency. So I think we could have Blam! Moment and Blam! Episode if no one thinks of a better option.
Hmm... Naming it Blam! Moment or Episode makes it sound like someone gets shot in the moment. Such a shocking moment would bring it back to Wham! Episode.
The rename has to convey "Appears out of Nowhere" (Ass Pull), "Strange in Context" (Makes Just as Much Sense in Context) and "Never Mentioned Again" (What Happened to the Mouse?) without being vague.
What about Wild Event Tangent?
Trope passed muster and launched.
Hey, guys, I'm trying to undo some of the red links in some of the work pages that I'm doing. But please use a fine comb to this new trope: https://allthetropes.org/wiki/Trope_Workshop:Adapted_Out
Since I know that there's probably something grammatically wrong, but please note, I'm trying to re-word it so we won't get in trouble with copyright. Here's the Tv Trope version: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/AdaptedOut
Well, I see you went out of your way to make a "from scratch" version that passes copyright muster, my gratitude for doing so.
I cleaned up some grammar and fixed a few trope links for you, just add some examples and you'll be good.
You can even use the same examples they did, just written in your own words, as the basic information about the examples is public access (i.e. - you can view the same media they did and see the examples like they did), but so long as you avoid copy-paste of someone else's work from there and write your own version of an example they used, that should pass legal muster.
Okay, I tried fixing some parts of the description and adding examples. Does it read well or must I fix it up some more?